I am not voting for a single incumbent on Tuesday, April 5th. I am one of those angry voters fed up with the lack of accountability that led to local government yearly spending increases that were twice or more higher than their annual revenue increases. More specifically, I’m sick of monster truck fiascoes, hiring independent contractors in closed sessions, non-public-bid contracts with an alderman, appointed boards that elected officials who appoint them have no power over (or desire) to correct their actions, fake rinks, tax and fee increases and borrowing money to lay people off… and the Mea Culpa response.
Said Bertrand Simpson at the Egyptian Theatre:
“Its not that we planned poorly or had poor plans — its just that the real world got in the way of our plans.” (see video)
I’m tired of the culture that allowed so many promises to be broken so quickly on the historic $110 million referendum. None are left unbroken and the high school hasn’t even opened. How important is a promise, to you, from someone asking for your vote? There’s a lot of people receiving or counting on a state pension who should think about that question. At least one sitting school board member should consider the importance of keeping promises if he was really serious about trying to pass an operational referendum.
When I review back since the last Consolidated Election there is nothing to fear about change.
I live in the 3rd Ward in DeKalb. If Pam Verbic would have run for re-election I may have had to break my rule about not voting for incumbents because I probably would have voted for her. Technically, she was appointed and that was after most of the above described disasters took place. She’s done a nice job of not going with the flow if the answers to her questions don’t jive.
It could be argued that the two candidates seeking to replace her are the hardest working campaigners out there. Not a day goes by that both of them aren’t personally knocking doors in their ward.
I watched Kristen Lash and soon learned she was a hard worker when she ran her husband’s (Jared) campaign for 6th ward alderman in the 2009 elections. She was an effective foot soldier for Kris Povlsen’s mayoral campaign and is listed as Communications Chair on the executive board of the DeKalb County Democrats. She has been attending city council meetings for several years and is always taking notes.
I’ve seen Paulette Sherman involved and in action before, too. As a board member she insisted on making sure the inconvenient truth that it cost more to house our local jail population in our jail than to send them to out-of-county facilities was made public. She testified in depositions and on the witness stand as a citizen for Stop The Mega-Dump. She was a foot soldier in Clay Campbell’s campaign in the last election.
Sherman made one of the eye popping statements of the campaign when she said that before she’d vote for a single cut in first responder staff there wouldn’t be an assistant city manager left. Sounds like she’s got her priorities in order. If I was an assistant city manager I think I’d go find some cuts or pay for my own subscriptions. 🙂
The Eye Popping Statement came from Bertrand Simpson, First Ward Alderman. Simpson thinks the problem with DeKalb city hall is the city manager form of government. He made sure to state that his opinion was not a reflection on the current city manager.
I’ve long felt that Home Rule and the City Manager form of government is a bad combination.
The Sad But True statement came from Simpson’s challenger, David Jacobson. It was a near tear jerker for me. When asked why he felt he was qualified to address the financial woes facing the city he said that his was the generation being told there would be no pensions or big raises for them so they were all learning how to do more with less.
The two minute video above is a nice little break from all the politics. NOT. Gracie and I left the Egyptian Theatre Candidate Forum and made it to The House Cafe in time catch a fabulous show of Beatles tribute put on by talented local musicians just for fun. I’ll unashamedly use the faces in this video to illustrate 5th Ward challenger, Rob Fischer’s, suggestion on the north 5th Ward neighborhood commonly known as John Street/College Avenue. That’s because several of the faces in the video live in and around that neighborhood.
He’d like to explore the possibility of addressing that neighborhood’s perceived deterioration through diversifying the zoning to allow boutiques, art studios, music stores, etc. He thinks it can be done without using government subsidy, like TIF, by allowing the market to open and flourish into a tourism destination. Its rather refreshing to hear of a plan that embraces NIU’s tradition, and its resources, instead of zoning them out.
There’s no incumbent running in the 7th Ward either. We know that Monica O’Leary is running. She’s been to the candidate forums. She’s got the coolest looking signs. Before Eric Calmeyer became a candidate for the 7th Ward I saw him regularly attending city council meetings. Since he became a candidate I haven’t seen him anywhere but that race could be a 100 yd sprint to 60 votes.
We need to fix that, too.
I have witnessed extreme conservatism this election cycle. We attended the Kirkland Candidates Forum at the still new Fire Department on the outskirts of town. John Pierce, candidate for Village Trustee, thinks $45,000 a year in administrative salaries is too much. That figure includes at least three part-to-full time employees. I’m known to be fiscally conservative on administration costs but, John, even I have to wince on that one. If you are a candidate for any race anywhere, or thinking about it, see how well you’d do with these tough questions, here and here.
Cortland candidates got some tough questions, too. Voters there have a referendum question to decide as the town board is asking for a 1-cent local sales tax. If approved the sales tax increase is projected to generate between $150,000-$180,000 annually.
Here’s the official ballot question: Shall the corporate authorities of the municipality be authorized to levy a tax at a rate of 1% for expenditures on municipal operations, expenditures on public infrastructure, or property tax relief? Quick poll: If passed, how much of the new tax will be used for A) municipal operations B) public infrastructure or C) property tax relief. You may choose up to three answers but you may not laugh.
In the First Ward Alderman race in Sycamore, Earl Gable is running against Gary Waight for the seat being vacated by Richard Neubauer. Second Ward Alderman Chuck Stowe is facing a challenge from Anthony Cvek. Those are the only contested races in Sycamore. No candidate forum was held.
If DeKalb County is going to beat the low voter turnout projected for the state (17%) it could well be because there are eleven candidates running for the District 428 of DeKalb, Cortland and Malta School Board.
For those who would accuse me of beating a dead horse I can only say that I am trying to resuscitate it. The result of low voter turnout is what we’ve got. We need to fix that. Vote and remind others to do so.
Click Here To Submit A News Tip Or Story
9 Comments


Herb – Mr Fischer’s flyer is 100% accurate. In fact, the laundry list of Mr. Naylor’s support of spending and tax increases didn’t go far enough. To assure accessible data was used, all dates and facts were taken from official city council meeting minutes posted on the City of DeKalb official website. However, the City of DeKalb online archives only go back two years. Mr Fischer’s brochure pointed out only two of Mr Naylor’s votes to INCREASE property taxes (DEC 2009 and DEC 2010), when, in fact, Mr Naylor voted to increase property taxes in Dec 2007 and Dec 2008, too. Links to this data were also listed on the brochure so that anyone looking at it could easily access the data.
There was NO Naylor bashing. Just pointing out the facts. An incumbent has to run on his or her record. Mr Naylor’s record is littered with Tax and fee increases.
Herb you’ll be happy to know that some people I encountered were happy to support Mr Naylor simply because they told me “I know him”. That’s fine. Though, the first thing out of the mouth of voters that I encountered were: “What’s the deal with taxes here in town and who’s responsible for these increases?”. I think you can probably answer that question.
I have no problem entering enemy territory. In fact, Herb, I had difficulty locating your house. It was shrouded by so many Naylor and Barnes political signs, I could hardly make my way up the door step (LOL). Herb, I wish you would have been at home yesterday afternoon, I would have thoroughly enjoyed a lively discussion

Mark,
We could argue about the meaning of Ron’s vote, as you know I am informed and don’t always think that taxes are inherently evil. We do need to pay for services and the Ron description left out (as one would expect in a political document) how Ron and others tried to balance out the severe cutbacks in city staffing with finding resources to maintain needed services.
But I too digress.
But the point of my note wasn’t on Ron. My note was a comment and an ilustration of my broader concern that campaigning involves attacking an opponent rather than presenting a positive agenda and used the flyer that you were circulating to make that point. Fischer does have some ideas that deserve discussion but from the literature circulated people would not know that.
And, second, I did enjoy your recognition of the humor of the situation.
herb

Herb – I wish you were home! Rob is a good man with great values. I have to admit most of the houses I stopped at who had Naylor signs didn’t have the slightest idea that Mr Naylor supported four straight property tax hikes, increases in their utility taxes, increases in the motor fuel tax and the $70K skating rink. A lot of them Naylor sign in their front yard because “Ron seems like a nice man”. Once they heard how he has devastated their bottom line, many told me they would vote for Mr Fischer. Ron Naylor is NOT being truthful with his constituents. I set them on the path of Truth (Mr Naylor’s Voting record is clear)

I’m thrilled to have a choice this time around. It’s been awhile. I am voting FOR Fischer because its time to break up the old boys network. I met Fischer at the Egyptian. He is articulate meaning he doesn’t mumble and he has fresh ideas. Naylor protects his cronies and nothing more.

Lynn,
Nothing dirty about Fischer’s ad. The flyer was a perfectly fair political statement,though with a negative tone that I am arguing discourages turn out — (i.e. if things are this bad, why should I the voter even try) . It attacked Naylor for supporting different taxes, though one could argue without presenting a full story.
But what I was arguing is that attacks (though legitimate) communicate a negativity that discourages some from voting; an attack presents a problem. What is then needed is a solution and the solutions should be Fischer’s platform and that was missing from the flyer.
What disappointed me is the flyer did not include some of, in fact, any of the ideas that Fishcer had mentioned such as the art district or whether or not it would fight to eliminate of the taxes (and then how he would make up for the missing revenue).
The entire flyer was a litany of complaints on Naylor’s supposed actions on taxes. But what was missing was a positive agenda of what Fischer would do or try to do if elected.
Speaking for myself and I hope for other voters I want to vote FOR someone, not against someone.
I don’t have a scanner: flyer has 5 sections four devoted to a tax of which Fischer disapproves and then a 5th indicating Naylor supports having a permanent funding source for infrastructure.
Flyer uses one side of a piece of paper. Other side would have been perfect for the presentation of a positive platform.
Herb

I haven’t seen anything of Rob’s I would characterize as an attack ad. Maybe Herb could scan it and send it to you, Mac, so we can better judge. There is some ugly stuff going on out there, but imo not by Rob Fischer in the 5th.

We’re hearing about some ugly stuff we’re trying to confirm. Stay tuned and blow the whistle!

One reason for voter alienation is the increase of attack ads rather than more positive messages. While the idea for an arts district has been around a long time,– actually dates back to Greg’s (I think) idea for a hotel near the river– long before Fisher moved to the city, it is an idea worth exploring again.. Yet, the campaign literature delivered to my house for Fischer, was entirely an attack ad, not bothering to mention some of Fischer’s own ideas. Negativism is known to lower voter turnout.
But an upside. The person delivering the ad I believe was Mark Charvat who knows my politics, apparently knows where I live, and understood and indicated to my wife who answered the door bell the e humor of his delivering an ad for a conservative candidate to Herb whose lawn had in it a Naylor sign. Kudos to Mark for recognizing the humor of the situation. There is hope we can communicate (and yes Mark I did chuckle.) (Though the funniest recent bit was someone who put me on a mailing list of a far right think? tank that sent me a request for a substantial contribution.)
Herb
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I encourage everyone, if you have no made up your mind, yet, to ,listen to the words of the Aldermadic and School Board candidates in their own words in this UN-Edited Audio from last week’s debates at the Egyptian Theatre:
Aldermadic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF0jbHaG_ds
School Board: http://www.youtube.com/user/DeKalbILLINOIS#p/a/u/0/VtJvdFFGAmQ