So you own property in a TIF district. You pay $5000 in annual property taxes. Your school district passes a referendum. Your property tax bill increases by $300 for your share of paying for the referendum. So now your tax bill is $5300. That $300 doesn’t go to the school district or towards the referendum. It goes to TIF. So does any other increase in your tax bill above the $5000 you paid before the TIF district was declared.
That’s how TIF works.
Oh, its supposed to work by investing those funds into the declared TIF district that results in private investment that leads to substantial increases in property values (which increases the tax base for all those dependent upon taxes) that wouldn’t have occured… if not for TIF.
Sometimes real life gets in the way of the best laid plans. Like now. Trying to increase EAV when property values are in a tail spin? Good luck with that. And if you are a school district in Illinois, and your taxpayers are paying back a referendum, you are desperate for increased EAV because otherwise you have to increase the rate you charge just to meet your debt obligation.
TIF can work wonders when used properly and as intended.
The DeKalb-Pond-Fisk neighborhood, once known as known as “The Haish Flats” subdivision, is about four blocks north of the downtown business district. In 1904 local builder/businessman Jacob Haish built a mixture of single family homes and two story wooden apartment buildings for his factory workers. The innovative Haish built the Haish Flats out of materials salvaged from the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago.
As time marched on the neighborhood deteriorated. As the homes became less desirable the crime rate increased. But TIF financing provided the tool for a cooperative effort of the City Council, City staff, a citizen group called the DeKalb-Pond-Fisk Neighborhood Block, and local builder/developer Steve Irving for redevelopment of the Haish Flats that preserved some of the sound older homes and replaced those beyond viable investment with fourteen new single-family dwellings, and a children’s park. This project was one of the first TIF programs undertaken.
In 1993 Barb City Manor and the City of DeKalb entered into an agreement that dedicated TIF funding for 20 years to the retirement center for major repairs to the former Joseph F. Glidden Memorial Hospital. Under that agreement, which ends June 30, 2013, the City of DeKalb pays for approved repairs above and beyond $10,000. Barb City Manor is located in TIF District 2.
In 2000, the city of DeKalb created the County Home TIF District in an attempt to redevelop the old DeKalb County Nursing Home into private development that would generate a substantial increase in the tax base. The Target shopping center is a result. That TIF district was retired 13 years early as it fulfilled its cost-recovery obligations. The County Home and the County Farm across the street previously generated no revenue for any of the taxing bodies and in the case of the County Home repairs were far beyond viable investment.
Eventually more and more TIF funding was spent on public works projects. The park district received funding for preservation of the old First National Bank building that is now home for the DeKalb Chamber of Commerce and ReNew DeKalb. The library received funding for the Haish Memorial Library repairs. The Egyptian Theatre received monies for needed repairs and renovations.
When the Central TIF District was extended in 2008 with landmark legislation signed by then Gov. Rod Blagojevich (Public Act 95-0709, which became effective January 29, 2008) 50% of the increment resulting from the ad valorem taxes levied upon real property in the Redevelopment Project Area would be declared surplus and distributed as provided for in an intergovernmental agreement between the City of DeKalb and taxing districts that extend into the Central TIF District. The money returned to the taxing bodies was done so “unencumbered” meaning it could be spent any way the receiving governmental unit desired.
In February of 2008, voters approved a $110 million referendum for school construction in District 428. At that time it was projected that the owner of a $200,000 home would pay $270 per year in additional property taxes to repay the debt obligation of the school construction.
Ordinarily, all properties in the TIF district would be levied for the school referendum tax but the monies collected would go into the TIF fund for reinvestment purposes. Under the intergovernmental agreement, signed by the late Mayor Frank Van Buer and school board president Mike Verbic, the school district would receive 50% of the TIF funds back (and that would include the increment for the referendum tax).
Technically, the portion of the referendum tax returned to the school district would be unencumbered TIF money and not referendum money.
When the Central TIF District was extended its boundaries were also expanded to include portions of a residential neighborhood known as the 5th Ward North Neighborhood which contains 126 buildings, of which 118 (94%) are 35 years of age or older as determined by field surveys. According to the City of DeKalb’s 2008 Amendment to the TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project many of those buildings are “obsolete in that they are no longer being used for their design use as single family dwellings, which results in a number of issues, including a widespread lack of adequate off-street parking and open space, which exerts a blighting influence on neighboring properties.”
City Manager, Mark Biernacki, told members of a citizen group called the Ellwood House Historic District that their help was needed in making a good neighborhood better. He has placemarked $100,000 in TIF funds for the North Fifth Ward Neighborhood in the FY2012 budget, subject to city council approval. The citizen group is looking to “formalize” its organization to help determine how future TIF funds could be spent. Their next meeting is tentatively scheduled for May 4.
Click Here To Submit A News Tip Or Story
6 Comments
I am generally no fan of TIF districts, especially when it comes to how much money School District 428 loses (especially to the City of DeKalb) and which then in some way must be made up, likely by increasing taxes (including longer term for bonds) on 428 taxpayers in Cortland, Malta, and rural areas of 428.
Having said the preceding, Malta’s TIF is one of the few that comes close to making sense. Had it not been for that TIF, the county and all other eligible tax levying bodies would still be collecting much lower taxes based on wet farmland which predated the Prairie Springs subdivision now standing in that farm field. The town of Malta would still have problems with its sewerage treatment facility and severe surface water flooding, basic infrastructure. The TIF increment and liability bonds on the subdivision project have improved life in Malta while laying a foundation for future higher revenues to all tax levying bodies. “But for” the TIF, there would remain a wet farm field and much smaller EAV.
As Mac requests, I also would like Stephen to tell us how he calculated the $35k he says the county loses to Malta. If this Stephen Reid is one and the same as the county board member from DeKalb, he should be able to tell us exactly how this money is calculated. That would be helpful. And then perhaps also tell us how much property tax revenue the county loses to DeKalb through TIFs. Of course as Mac says, imagine the school district’s loss.
TIF districts reduce funding for other governmental bodies such as the county. Malta’s TIF costs the county over $35,000 annually. Of course they expect the same level of service from the county despite cutting vital revenue. Now Cortland is considering a TIF. It isn’t “free” money for the cities to spend, services still need to be funded. Where is the money going to come from, higher taxes? Voters hate that idea.
@Stephen, Interesting. If Malta’s TIF is costing the County $35k/yr then I wonder what it costs Dist 428?
How are you figuring those costs? Could you apply that formula to DeKalb and Sycamore?
@Linda, @Darold, there really isn’t enough intergovernmental cooperation for the school district and the City to have pulled a fast one together but coincidentally their combined actions will likely result in a growing tax burden for school construction debt obligation.
Concerned taxpayers (and rentpayers, too) should contact their newly elected school board members and the three existing members that were not up for election and demand that they apply the $21 million grant money to the debt repayment. Also ask if they are applying referendum dollars recaptured through their intergovernmental agreement with the City towards its intended purpose or if they are exploiting a loophole.
You seem to be implying that the city and school district pulled a fast one here. If this is true I’ll be very disappointed. I hope to see some kind of verification. Soon!!!
so is the SD using the TIF for operations or the referendum? How can they get away with that?
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This is according to the county clerk’s office and county finance.
Dekalb TIF#1 $638,097 Tif#2 $403,084 Tif#3 $298,208 Tif#4 0 Tif#5 $89,864.
Malta TIF $35,571 Kirkland $54,137 Waterman $38,043 Sycamore $21,587
These numbers are based the county rate of 0.9523 X EAV. The total county share for all TIFs was $1,578,591
One thing to note, Dekalb TIF#1 will return about half of the money to the county and other bodies after the length of it was extended. These numbers are for 2010.
As worthwhile as TIFs may be they cost the county a lot of revenue.